Thursday, November 23, 2023

Friday, November 24. 2023

Today's schedule is DCBA

D/C Blocks Social and Environmental Sciences - Today both Benton and I will touch on Indigenous worldviews and Traditional Knowledge with you. From the University of Alberta Faculty of Native Studies online class Indigenous Canada: Looking Forward/Looking Back through Coursera, the unit on Sovereign Lands states:
From an Indigenous perspective, the land is a much larger concept more equated to the term ecosystem, which describes the interconnected relationships between the physical environment, biological organisms, atmosphere, and, in the case of Indigenous worldview, spiritual realm. The land is often described as sentient, meaning it has its own agency, spirit, and rights that are to be respected as much as those of humans and other beings...

 Although Indigenous worldviews vary significantly between cultural groups, there are some common themes that differ from Western worldviews, especially in relation to the land. The role of human beings, our connection to other living beings, and the land are fundamentally different in an Indigenous context. An Indigenous worldview places humans in an interconnected relationship with the rest of living and nonliving beings. Indigenous peoples see human beings as the caretakers of the land, recognizing that our survival depends on how we interact with each other and everything around us.

Defining traditional ecological knowledge (often referred to as TEK) in the context of Indigenous worldview is not a simple task, TEK is a western concept. A commonly referenced definition of TEK is “a cumulative body of knowledge, practice and belief, evolving by adaptive processes and handed down through generations by cultural transmission, about the relationship of living beings (including humans) with one another and with their environment”  From an Indigenous perspective, TEK is not a pool of data or discipline of study. Instead, it is a way of life, a way of being and doing, a connection to the land, laws, roles and responsibilities that are embedded in stories
Consider the following to help you with your similarities/differences (from Indigenous and Western Approaches to Environmental Science)

Two ways of knowing:

Western approaches to environmental science focus on finding solutions to tackle existing environmental issues through practical data gathering and analysis. These solution-oriented approaches evolve as current technologies or modern equipment evolve for higher efficiency, better pattern recognition and predictability. Sometimes western approaches are viewed as invasive or even hasty; however as far as we can go, sophisticated research studies can deliver evidence-based findings that help form or enhance environmental laws and policies that shape today’s world. But just how fast can we chase after the world’s changing climate and emerging environmental issues?

Indigenous approaches, also known as Traditional Ecological Knowledge or simply Traditional Knowledge, are representations of experience and skills gained over thousands of years co-existing organically in a complex ecosystem. Although these approaches are frequently associated with ontological and spiritual concepts, they are gradually but surely being recognized as proof of practical sustainability, and the finest expression of human survival and adaptation. With one foot outside the world of science, Indigenous approaches remind us of our basic role as part of nature, and of our basic human instinct to strike for survival as opposed to taking it for granted. Now the question is: just how far can we go relying solely on western approaches to solve all the modern-day environmental problems?

From TRADITIONAL ECOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE CONCEPTS AND CASES

In general, TEK differs from scientific ecological knowledge in a number of substantive ways:

1. TEK is mainly qualitative (as opposed to quantitative);

2. TEK has an intuitive component (as opposed to being purely rational);

3. TEK is holistic (as opposed to reductionist);

4. In TEK, mind and matter are considered together (as opposed to a separation of mind and matter);

5. TEK is moral (as opposed to supposedly value-free);

6. TEK is spiritual (as opposed to mechanistic);

7. TEK is based on empirical observations and accumulation of facts by trial-and-error (as opposed to experimentation and systematic, deliberate accumulation of fact);

8. TEK is based on data generated by resource users themselves (as opposed to that by a specialized cadre of researchers);

9. TEK is based on diachronic data, i.e., long time-series on information on one locality (as opposed to synchronic data, i.e., short time-series over a large area).

For more on worldview differences you can check out Chapter 8 – When Uncles Become Killer Whales: Bridging Indigenous Science, Western Science and Worldviews from the text Knowing Home: Braiding Indigenous Science with Western Science




Benton has two questions for you...
Q1 – Collectively what are we losing if the Penan are displaced from their ancestral forests?
Q2 – How do we assess oral history to integrate the knowledge with Western Science quantifiable data?

You will have the rest of the morning to continue your land use project. This is what we have so far...missing two of you 😕

Mary - Peru, Manu - illegal logging, livestock and park buffer
Sierra - Hawaii - Maui, Lahaina fires
Judah - Costa Rica - Afforestation
Shermane - Panama - Darien Gap
Olivia - Taiga, illegal logging and effects on ecosystem
Aidan -  Myanmar deforestation 
Riley - Himalaya - fuel wood and commercial logging
Quoc - Sri Lanka - deforestation for agriculture/ plantations
Justin - Vancouver Island - old growth logging (*Is this Fairy Creek or some other watersheds?)
Teagan - Urban Farming, focus on land use for community gardening
Paula - Borneo, palm plantation deforestation
Kim - Tasmania - deforestation for Japanese Pulp demand 
Claire - Portugal forest fires
Taylor Ca - BC interior - beetles and fires
Taylor Ch - Western Australia - mining issues
Simon - Brazil - Rondônia - illegal forestry
Tari - Haida Gwaii - forestry and invasive species
Javin - DRC deforestation for agriculture
Carter - Venezuela - deforestation for mining and agriculture
Rylen - Gabon - forest preservation
Liam - Nigeria - Edo, deforestation for agriculture
Sarah - Madagascar - deforestation
Pfeifer - Choco in Ecuador, conversion to plantation 
Jakob - Land degradation (soil salinization due to over irrigation) in Punjab 

B Block Human Geography - Today we'll look at the key question, "Why Is English Related to Other Languages"? English is part of the Indo-European language family. A language family is a collection of languages related through a common ancestral language that existed long before recorded history. Indo-European is divided into eight branches. Four of the branches—Indo-Iranian, Romance, Germanic, and Balto-Slavic—are spoken by large numbers of people while the four less extensively used Indo-European language branches are Albanian, Armenian, Greek, and Celtic. English is part of the West Germanic group of the Germanic branch of the Indo-European language family.





And to help you with language diffusion for Indo-European languages (remember the question about the nomadic warrior and sedentary farmer hypotheses?)


You have two charts to fill in a three questions to work on for me today

A Block Legal Studies -  Today we'll talk about: firearms (the Firearms Act along with non-restricted, restricted and prohibited weapons); prostitution/the sex trade which includes Obtaining sexual services for consideration CC286.1(1) and Procuring 286.3(1); and obscenity which includes Obscene materials CC163(1) along with Making child pornography 163.1(2) Distribution, etc. of child pornography 163.1(3) Possession of child pornography 163.1(4) or Accessing child pornography 163.1(4.1)  
It is important to note: The Supreme Court of Canada struck down the country's anti-prostitution laws in a unanimous decision, and gave Parliament one year to come up with new legislation. In striking down laws prohibiting brothels, living on the avails of prostitution and communicating in public with clients, the top court ruled that the laws were over-broad and "grossly disproportionate." The government replaced the law with Bill C-36 (2014) which received Royal Assent and became law on December 6, 2014.

Purchasing sexual services and communicating in any place for that purpose is now a criminal offence for the first time in Canadian criminal law (a person convicted of this new offence may be sentenced to up to 5 years imprisonment if prosecuted on indictment, and 18 months if prosecuted by summary conviction). The new prostitution laws do not criminalize the sale of sexual services. the new law protects from criminal liability people who receive money from the sale of their own sexual services.

These laws are being challenged once again in the Supreme Court of Canada. To find out more check out more on the escort agency challenge here or the Canadian Alliance for Sex Work Law Reform challenge here and an October 2022 challenge in Ontario Superior Court here.


What is obscene? We'll look at the legal definition of "obscenity". 

s. 163 (8) For the purposes of this Act, any publication a dominant characteristic of which is the undue exploitation of sex, or of sex and any one or more of the following subjects, namely, crime, horror, cruelty and violence, shall be deemed to be obscene.

R.S., 1985, c. C-46, s. 163; 1993, c. 46, s. 1; 2018, c. 29, s. 11.

The Criminal Code section 163 subsection 3 (Defence of public good) states that No person shall be convicted of an offence under this section if the public good was served by the acts that are alleged to constitute the offence and if the acts alleged did not extend beyond what served the public good. 

So what are the community standards of tolerance that determine a "public good"? 

Immoral acts are distinguished from crimes on the basis of the social harm they cause. Acts that are believed to be extremely harmful to the general public are usually outlawed, whereas acts that only the harm the actor themselves are more likely to be tolerated. Acts that are illegal because they are viewed as a threat to morality are called public order crimes.

If there's time, for a different case of obscenity we'll look at "Sniffy the Rat" and artist Rick Gibson. To either giggle or be horrified check out the CBC story hereIs it Really Art or is it Obscene? Philosophy Talk "Art and Obscenity"

Lastly I'll have you work on questions:
  • questions 2-3-4 on page 257 of the All About Law text (yesterday)
  • questions 1, 2, & 3 on page 240 of the All About Law text along with 
  • questions 1 & 2 from page 244 of the All About Law text.

Today's Fit...


 

No comments: