Sunday, February 8, 2026

An Apt Metaphor

It's time...


...after 33+ years, it is time for me to say goodbye to GP Vanier, the Comox Valley School District, and my public school teaching career. Yes, it's time for me to ride off into the sunset. I have a few thoughts I'd like to share about my career, but before I do I beseech you, in a time where Social Studies education has become increasingly relevant yet institutionally marginalized this is my call to you for action...


Support Geographic Education!

Why?


A vibrant, strong, and functioning civic society cannot exist without a solid geographic understanding. Geography is not simply the memorization of maps or capitals, that is an outdated model which we do not follow and anyone who spent any time in Room 611/115 clearly knows this. Geography is the study of how people, places, resources, and environments interact. It's about connecting our places and our stories with others and finding out how we impact each other. Without that knowledge, civic decision-making becomes dangerously disconnected from reality.

Every civic choice happens "somewhere". Policies about housing, transportation, water use, food systems, climate resilience, and public health are fundamentally geographic decisions. When citizens understand spatial relationships, when citizens understand where resources are located, when citizens understand how communities are connected and why regions face different challenges, then citizens are better equipped to evaluate policy and can hold their leaders accountable. Geography grounds civic debate in real places with real consequences, not in theoretical debates or abstractions.

Geographic education also builds awareness of interdependence. No community exists in isolation. Supply chains cross borders, environmental systems ignore political lines, and migration reshapes societies. A geographically literate public understands that local actions can have regional and global effects. This awareness encourages cooperation rather than isolationism and prepares citizens to respond thoughtfully to shared challenges such as climate change, pandemics, and economic disruption. I would argue that the current world dynamic is a clear example of why geographic education is crucial. To that end...

Just as critically, geography cultivates empathy and civic cohesion. By studying cultures, regions, and lived environments, students learn that people’s perspectives are shaped by where they live. I've always claimed that travel is one of the best geographic teachers. It teaches you not only about where you are in the world, but also critically a great deal about where you come from as well. We are all informed by our climate, economy, history, and access to resources. This understanding reduces fear of differences and counters simplistic stereotypes. A society that understands why communities differ is better able to govern inclusively and resolve conflict peacefully.

Geography also equips citizens to navigate misinformation. Maps, data visualizations, and spatial statistics are powerful tools, but they can be and clearly are manipulated. If you spent any time in room 611/115 you may remember the "upside down world map" and the "all maps lie because they are artificial representations of the Earth created by someone for some purpose" speech.  Geographic education teaches people how to interpret data critically, recognize distorted representations, and question who created them and for what purpose. In a data-driven world, spatial literacy is civic literacy.

At a time when environmental pressures are intensifying, geography is indispensable to civic resilience. Understanding natural hazards, land use, and environmental systems enables communities to plan wisely, protect vulnerable populations, and steward resources responsibly. Civic strength depends not only on laws and institutions, but on a shared commitment to sustaining the places people call home.

Ultimately, geography answers a central civic question: "How do we live together in shared space"? It teaches that place matters. It teaches that decisions shape landscapes and landscapes shape lives. A society that values a strong and vibrant geography education prepares its citizens to think beyond themselves, to see connections rather than boundaries and to act with informed responsibility.

If we want a civic society that is informed, empathetic, and capable of meeting the realities of an interconnected world, geography must be at its core. It teaches that citizenship is not passive consumption, but active participation. It reminds people that a well meaning democracy is not a guarantee. It requires practice. A society that invests in geographic education is choosing informed engagement over ignorance, empathy over division, and responsibility over complacency. To neglect geographic education is to gamble with the future. A society that cannot remember, analyze, or empathize is easily manipulated and quick to fracture. Again, take a look at the news, the current state of the world is a clear example of this. If we want a population capable of critical thought, moral reasoning, and collective problem-solving, we must invest in the subject that weaves all of those together. Geography helps us understand the world which is the first step toward caring for it and caring for one another.

Idealistic? Yes, but eminently true. We need social studies education anchored in a robust understanding of geography.


As for me and my career...


When I look back on my thirty plus years as a high school geography teacher, I’m struck, not just by how much the world has changed but also by how much of it I’ve tried to explain using maps that were out of date almost as soon as I put them up on the wall. For many people, geography is a subject on a timetable. For me, geography is a way of seeing the world and more importantly, a way of helping young humans how to understand it.

As a passionate believer in the power of geography, my enthusiasm was absolutely unmistakable. You could hear it in my voice booming around the hallways in the back corner of Vanier (sorry Leigh-Ellen) when discussing tornadoes, volcanoes, or earthquakes ("NOW....NOW...or NOW"). I like to think you could see it in the way lessons came alive, and feel it in the classroom atmosphere (or feel it through the walls). I tried to make the world feel bigger and more exciting, while somehow also making it feel more understandable. My aim was to nurture curiosity, perspective, and critical thinking. I wanted students to see the world as complex, interconnected, and worth questioning. Ultimately I hoped that students would recognise their place within the world which we walk through together.

I began teaching in a very different era. Back then, remember the 90's? The internet was something you dialed up on a landline telephone and waited for what would now seem like an eternity to go to. Much Music and MTV shaped a generation of music by actually showing music video on their channels (oh man, 1993: Nirvana – In Utero; The Smashing Pumpkins – Siamese Dream; Pearl Jam – Vs.; Counting Crows – August and Everything After; & Stone Temple Pilots – Core). And in the 90's, Geography assignments were handwritten, sometimes legibly, but mostly without the aid of AI. As the world changed through globalisation, technology, climate change, and shifting social pressures, so too did the classroom. What didn’t change was simple, really...

Teaching is never really about content, it is always about people. 

My aim was always to move beyond content and help students develop critical thinking, global awareness, and the ability to question simplistic narratives...I tried to encourage this from the Global Awareness Fair at Charles Hays Secondary in Prince Rupert through to the Geographic Inquiry Fair at GP Vanier Secondary in Courtenay and in so many other ways at all stops inbetween. As the world became more complex, so too did the responsibility of teaching it honestly and thoughtfully.  I took pride in being prepared, consistent, and present for my students. I believed that showing up giving your best every day mattered. This also meant that my "teacher uniform" went from casual to business casual even though I rode my bike to work every day. This confused students because they often wondered if I rode to work in slacks, a dress shirt and tie with my fancy work shoes every day. I mean, TBH, this blog ended up really only being used by students to check out what Young's fit would be rather than checking what the day's lesson would be.

Equally important to me was teaching with principle. I believe in fairness, respect, and integrity, and I tried to model those values consistently. I encouraged students to think critically, challenge assumptions, and consider different perspectives. I hoped that, alongside academic knowledge, they would leave my classroom with a stronger sense of empathy and responsibility. My Criminology students would probably remember my final refrain... Don't be a doormat.

Dedication remained central to my practice, but what dedication looked like changed over time. Very early on, back in my days teaching in Prince Rupert, I learned that strong relationships mattered more than any worksheet or PowerPoint (I still can't believe we actually use Power Point today, I mean it's a super exciting educational technology...for 1993 🙄). What was reinforced to me was that students learn best when they feel safe, respected, and known. Sometimes that meant knowing who needed encouragement, who needed a challenge, and who just needed a quiet moment and a pen that actually worked. Over time, student wellbeing became just as important as academic success, if not more so. 

As student lives grew more complex, my role as a teacher expanded in ways I don't think I was fully prepared for. Students arrived carrying not only backpacks, but pressure, worry, and the occasional crippling existential crisis. Responding to that required empathy, flexibility, and sometimes the wisdom to abandon the lesson plan and focus on what students actually needed in that moment. My passion for geography sustained me throughout these changes. The subject became ever more urgent as students grappled with climate change, migration, inequality, and environmental degradation. I sought to create learning spaces where students felt encouraged to ask difficult questions, engage with uncomfortable truths, and see geography not as a static body of knowledge, but as a living, evolving way of understanding the world.

Geography gave us countless opportunities to connect learning to real life, and nowhere was that more obvious than on our trips to Mount St. Helens. For seventeen years, I had the privilege and the responsibility of taking students there. Those trips were never just about volcanic processes, though there was plenty of ash, stunning vistas, and caves to explore. They were about curiosity, shared experience, and watching students see the power of the natural world up close.

The Mount Saint Helens trips were also about early mornings, long bus rides, questionable food choices, questionable direction choices in lava caves, and repeated reminders to stay with the group ("Sound off Numbers please, I'll start ONE ..") But those days mattered. Something about being out there, standing on the landscape, asking questions, and learning together, built relationships in a way no classroom ever quite could. As did K9 police chases through hotel hallways..."Cops, on location, in Olympia". For many students, those trips became the moment geography felt real, and school felt meaningful. It was an absolute honour to share those experiences with so many colleagues and I am grateful for their willingness to help. Two people, however, were absolutely instrumental in our success. Matt Bourget was my original teaching partner who helped start these experiences and came along from 2006-2015. Were it not for him, we wouldn't have met Bill Nye the Science Guy on the mountain in 2009 and frankly I don't think we would have been anywhere near as successful without his passion and commitment. When Matt retired, Jason Arsenault stepped in and revitalized the expeditions from 2017-2025. Jason's unabashed giddy nerdy excitement and bad dad jokes always lifted the spirits of everyone. He quickly became the heart of the trip. It was a most wonderful experience to watch these two master teachers build relationships with so many students beyond the walls of a traditional classroom. 

My dedication to teaching never wavered but clearly evolved over time. At first, it meant mastering content and planning lessons. Later, it meant reading the room, adapting on the fly, and understanding that learning doesn’t always happen exactly when the bell rings. My passion for geography endured simply because it remained deeply relevant to students’ lives. As global challenges became more immediate and personal, I saw how powerful it was for students to feel that their concerns were acknowledged and taken seriously. Encouraging critical thinking while also supporting emotional resilience became an essential balance. Although my passion for geography mattered, caring for the students in front of me mattered more.

I tried to teach with the guiding principles of fairness, respect, and integrity. In a world that became faster, louder, and sometimes more divided, those values helped anchor both my teaching and my relationships with students. When I think about the impact of these 30+ teaching years, I don’t think in terms of tests, exams or courses completed...those are not the results I am interested in. I think about the relationships built, the trust earned, and the students who left knowing they were supported, capable, and heard.

As I move into retirement, I do so with deep gratitude. Gratitude for the students who challenged me, for the students who surprised me, for the students who were patient with me, for the students who taught me more than any textbook or university pedagogy class ever could, and for the students who occasionally corrected my technology skills as they became progressively outdated. It has been a privilege to share this journey with each of the over seven thousand students with whom I've worked. Thank you for the countless memories and the reminders of why this work mattered. Teaching has been a privilege. It has reminded me, again and again, that education is a deeply human endeavour and that care, connection, and kindness will always matter more than perfectly coloured maps. But seriously, as my friend and teaching partner David Benton knows all too well from my many requests, please make sure you colour all in one direction, keep the shade consistent, and stay within the lines.

Be well and go be the amazing human beings I know you have become.


Thursday, June 26, 2025

Congratulations and Thank You

Congratulations Geography and Criminology families, you made it! 

Special shout out to this year's Grads...WTG🥳



Also, I just wanted to take this opportunity to thank all of you. My time at Vanier, this year, was special because I got to spend it with you. Now, go out and be amazing!

Best, Young


Thursday, June 19, 2025

Last Day - Friday, June 20. 2025

Today's schedule is ABCD

A Block Physical Geography - Today, we finish HOME. Think about the title. What is our collective home? Now think about the statement from the beginning of the film today...
Listen to me, please. You're like me, a homo sapiens. A wise human. Life; a miracle in the universe appeared around 4 billion years ago and we humans only 200,000 years ago, yet we have succeeded in disrupting the balance so essential to life. Listen carefully to this extraordinary story, which is yours, and decide what you want to do with it. 

I cannot stress this enough...this movie is amazing! It perfectly encapsulates both Human and Physical Geography...it is both a cautionary tale of human impacts and a love letter to the planet. At the end, the narrator (Glenn Close) says,
"Must we always build walls to break the chain of human solidarity, separate peoples and protect the happiness of some from the misery of others? It's too late to be a pessimist. I know that a single human can knock down every wall. It's too late to be a pessimist. Worldwide, four children out of five attend school. Never has learning been given to so many human beings. Everyone, from richest to poorest, can make a contribution" 
Good Planet Foundation President Yann-Arthus Bertrand (the film maker for Home) says "I think it’s too late to be pessimistic. There’s no way to think optimistically or not – we need actions. Everybody has a mission and everybody can do something. The way you live is very important, in your private life.

Geography family if you are interested, UBC Geography is one of the top geography departments in the world...the 2025 QS World University Rankings by Subject rank UBC Geography as the number 12 school in the entire world (It's number 3 in North America behind UCal Berkeley and UCLA and it's the number one school in Canada). These rankings are based upon academic reputation, employer reputation and research impact. The UBC undergraduate program is divided into three fields: B.A. in Human Geography, B.A. in Environment and Sustainability, and B.Sc. in Geographical Sciences. UVICSFUVIUUNBCUFV and TRUoffer both a B.A. and a B.Sc. in Geography while KPU offers a B.A. and BCIT offers a GIS training program. 

Almost any Introduction to Physical Geography class is basically the Physical Geography class at Vanier (like GEOG 108 - Introduction to Physical Geography @ UBC, GEOG103 @ UVIC, or GEOG1221 @ TRU - sometimes called Earth Systems like GEOG111 @ SFU)…seriously, just look at this weather forecasting lab exercise from the Laboratory Manual for Introduction to Physical Geography (the manual provides 24 labs to be implemented within first year post-secondary physical geography courses)…look familiar at all?!?!

Don't forget that: 


Enjoy and remember that Geography Rules.

B Block Criminology - We are in the Library / Learning Commons. Your question this week is:


Why do you think True Crime is such a popular content area/genre in mass media and what are the potential effects of consuming it? Are the voyeurisms of consuming the True Crime genre of media an example of curiosity or exploitation? Regardless of your opinion of Casey Anthony is it possible for her to escape the negative label of "Tot Mom" and will she ever be able to avoid the horrible mother image presented by CNN and Nancy Grace? Use examples from the Casey Anthony trial to explain your ideas. How does the concept of Schadenfreude and Cancel Culture apply to the Casey Anthony trial? Did the media shame, call out, or try to cancel Casey Anthony? How would low self-esteem make someone more likely to seek out schadenfreude-filled crime media? Is Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat) good or bad for criminal trials and the news/media coverage of them? Use examples from the Casey Anthony trial and from either Monica Lewinsky's story or those in the 15 Minutes of Shame video (Matt Colvin, Emmanuel Cafferty, or Laura Krolczyk) to explain your ideas


You should consider the following when answering your question: 
  1. Think about who reports information and how that information is used.
  2. Think about your privacy and how you manage your on-line presence.
  3. Think about how social media can be introduced as evidence at trials.
  4. Think about how social media can be used for reporting during trials.
  5. Do viewer/user comments about media coverage of a trial provide valuable feedback for discussion or not? Why?
  6.  Is public shaming protected by the right to free speech or is this a case where our old norms and principles have simply been exposed as unfit for a new era?

I've got links to the following articles on the site that I'd like you to scan through to help with your answers PLEASE USE THEM (not yelling....well maybe):
Social Media and News Fact Sheet
Social media guided defense in Casey Anthony case
Social media v. Casey Anthony
Social Media’s Influence on the Casey Anthony Trial
Social media revolutionized coverage of Casey Anthony trial
The Casey Anthony Case and Public Perception of the Criminal Justice System
How the Casey Anthony Murder Case Became the Social-Media Trial of the Century
Watching a Trial on TV, Discussing It on Twitter
How "Trial by Media" Can Undermine the Courtroom
Social Media Has Changed Crime and the Justice System
Social Media and the Fair Trial
Social Media in the Courtroom
Tweeting from trials: How social media gives crime followers a front-row seat

And...please remember the most important things I care about are that you:
  1. Don't be a doormat
  2. Don't be a doormat...and 
  3. Don't be a doormat

If you are interested UFVVIU and SFU offer Criminology degrees here in British Columbia. You can also find Criminology diploma programs at Douglas CollegeNorth Island College (here in the Comox Valley), Camosun College and Kwantlen Polytechnic University. You can also find programs on policing and criminal justice at the Justice Institute of BC and the Bachelor of Arts in Justice Studies at Royal Roads University.


Today's Fit...
Same shirt & tie combo as my first day as a Teacher... October 5th, 1992






 

Wednesday, June 18, 2025

Thursday, June 19. 2025

Today is the second to last day of the semester and the schedule is DCBA

B Block Criminology -  Oh...Casey Anthony and the Media frenzy that was and still is...I want you to try to make sense of the crime (Casey and Caylee Anthony), the media's coverage of the crime (particularly Nancy Grace), feminist perspectives on criminology, the bad mother motif, and Schadenfreude.  No TL;DR here okay?!

HLN's Nancy Grace covered the Casey Anthony trial heavily in 2011. To her credit Nancy Grace was a criminal prosecutor in Georgia. Here is a CNN bio on her..


HLN's Nancy Grace covered the Casey Anthony trial heavily in 2011. Grace had her own trial of Casey Anthony in the media. Here is a sampling of her coverage


After the verdict here's what she had to say - which further shaped the public's opinion of Casey Anthony even after she was found not guilty by a jury of her peers


Now, here's what the media had to say about the media covering the Casey Anthony trial


And here's what CBC had to discuss about Nancy Grace on the show Q


Does the trial have a longer lasting impact on the USA or was it just 15 minutes of fame and a distraction from mundane daily life? Because of her actions, Nancy Grace has been spoofed on SNL and MadTV to name just two... 



HBO had a television series called The Newsroom and they had an amazing bit on Nancy Grace's coverage of Tot Mom...


CNN did a retrospective piece on the trial here


Grace is currently the host of the podcast Crime Stories with Nancy Grace and the Fox Nation series of the same name and is also the founder of the website CrimeOnline. Grace told The Daily Beast in an article titled Nancy Grace Doesn’t Regret a Goddamn Thing  
“I report and cover and investigate very disturbing criminal cases. I consider those facts to be evidence. If other people consider true crime to be sensational, I would say that they’re wrong,”

You should take some time to understand the German psychology/sociology term Schadenfreude. This term deals with a big concept - that as humans, we have a private rush of glee when someone else struggles (we take delight in another person's pain and misfortune). Schadenfreude registers in the brain as a pleasurable experience, a satisfaction comparable to that of eating a good meal. Schadenfreude is a common and normal part of life but can become dangerous if we lose empathy, fall into demonizing others, or lapse into “us vs. them” thinking.

There is a human fascination with murder as entertainment and news media companies have turned the story of the death of a toddler into a prime time circus...a story that we can safely watch and perhaps feel a little guilty pleasure in the fact that we're better than Casey Anthony. Her pain and suffering on television brings us delight and makes us feel good in that we are not the monster that the media has portrayed her out to be...sigh.

Matt Wild wrote a piece called The guilty (and not-so-guilty) pleasures of Dateline NBC and in it he stated
...for an alarming number of Americans—myself included—Dateline has become appointment viewing. Mad Men, Downton Abbey, and their ilk are fine, but there’s a distinct, guilty pleasure in staying home on a Friday night, dimming the lights, sounding off on Twitter with other like minded fans, and watching the sordid true-life tales of murderous spouses (usually husbands), sorrowful family members (usually parents), and sinister motives (almost always infidelity) unspool over the course of an hour, all narrated by the stern and sonorous Morrison, or the rumpled and incredulous Mankiewicz. Murder, shattered families, and desperate cries for justice: perfect for a cozy night of popcorn, wine, and incessant tweeting.
So you have a question to answer for me: 
Why do you think True Crime is such a popular content area/genre in mass media and what are the potential effects of consuming it? Are the voyeurisms of consuming the True Crime genre of media an example of curiosity or exploitation? Regardless of your opinion of Casey Anthony is it possible for her to escape the negative label of "Tot Mom" and will she ever be able to avoid the horrible mother image presented by CNN and Nancy Grace? Use examples from the Casey Anthony trial to explain your ideas. How does the concept of Schadenfreude and Cancel Culture apply to the Casey Anthony trial? Did the media shame, call out, or try to cancel Casey Anthony? How would low self-esteem make someone more likely to seek out schadenfreude-filled crime media? Is Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat) good or bad for criminal trials and the news/media coverage of them? Use examples from the Casey Anthony trial and from either Monica Lewinsky's story or those in the 15 Minutes of Shame video (Matt Colvin, Emmanuel Cafferty, or Laura Krolczyk) to explain your ideas

You should consider the following when answering your question: 
  1. Think about who reports information and how that information is used.
  2. Think about your privacy and how you manage your on-line presence.
  3. Think about how social media can be introduced as evidence at trials.
  4. Think about how social media can be used for reporting during trials.
  5. Do viewer/user comments about media coverage of a trial provide valuable feedback for discussion or not? Why?
  6.  Is public shaming protected by the right to free speech or is this a case where our old norms and principles have simply been exposed as unfit for a new era?

A Block Physical Geography - To help with your questions about Consumption and Climate, today and tomorrow we'll watch Home, an incredible documentary by Yann Arthus-Bertrand who also helped to initiate a foundation called Good PlanetPlease take some time to share this movie with as many family and friends as you can. You can watch it on line at the YouTube home project's channel or connect with it on the film's Facebook page or watch it below...

Think about the title. What is our collective home? Now think about the statement from the beginning of the film today...

Listen to me, please. You're like me, a homo sapiens. A wise human. Life; a miracle in the universe appeared around 4 billion years ago and we humans only 200,000 years ago, yet we have succeeded in disrupting the balance so essential to life. Listen carefully to this extraordinary story, which is yours, and decide what you want to do with it. 

I cannot stress this enough...this movie is amazing! It perfectly encapsulates both Human and Physical Geography...it is both a cautionary tale of human impacts and a love letter to the planet. At the end, the narrator (Glenn Close) says,
"Must we always build walls to break the chain of human solidarity, separate peoples and protect the happiness of some from the misery of others? It's too late to be a pessimist. I know that a single human can knock down every wall. It's too late to be a pessimist. Worldwide, four children out of five attend school. Never has learning been given to so many human beings. Everyone, from richest to poorest, can make a contribution" 
Good Planet Foundation President Yann-Arthus Bertrand (the film maker for Home) says "I think it’s too late to be pessimistic. There’s no way to think optimistically or not – we need actions. Everybody has a mission and everybody can do something. The way you live is very important, in your private life. To that end, look at all the good that is going on right now:



Today's Fit...


 

Tuesday, June 17, 2025

Wednesday, June 18. 2025

Today's schedule is BADC

B Block Criminology -  Cindy, Casey, and Caylee Anthony...I want you to try to make sense of the crime (Casey and Caylee Anthony), the media's coverage of the crime (particularly Nancy Grace), feminist perspectives on criminology, the bad mother motif, Schadenfreude, and the way fictional crime media represented the story (Law & Order: Special Victim's Unit). 

Remember this crime is relevant in that it represents a massive shift in what crimes are reported, spectacle culture and what is considered "newsworthy", how crime reporting changed with different media platforms, the polarization of society connected to injustice and outrage. Nancy Grace helped to shape a decade’s worth of suspected murderers and rapists in the public imagination, stressing their cruelty and alien coldness, tapping into a cultural enthusiasm for righteous witch hunts and armchair convictions (Lots more on this tomorrow and then next week with the documentary "15 Minutes of Shame")

Today we'll conclude with part 3 of the retrospective 2017 Investigation Discovery documentary Casey Anthony: An American Murder Mystery


And after watching some media coverage of the media coverage tomorrow (*cough cough Nancy Grace)...you'll have a massive wrap up question to answer for me:

Why do you think True Crime is such a popular content area/genre in mass media and what are the potential effects of consuming it? Are the voyeurisms of consuming the True Crime genre of media an example of curiosity or exploitation? Regardless of your opinion of Casey Anthony is it possible for her to escape the negative label of "Tot Mom" and will she ever be able to avoid the horrible mother image presented by CNN and Nancy Grace? Use examples from the Casey Anthony trial to explain your ideas. How does the concept of Schadenfreude and Cancel Culture apply to the Casey Anthony trial? Did the media shame, call out, or try to cancel Casey Anthony? How would low self-esteem make someone more likely to seek out schadenfreude-filled crime media? Is Social Media (Facebook, Twitter, TikTok, Instagram, Snapchat) good or bad for criminal trials and the news/media coverage of them? Use examples from the Casey Anthony trial and from either Monica Lewinsky's story or those in the 15 Minutes of Shame video (Matt Colvin, Emmanuel Cafferty, or Laura Krolczyk) to explain your ideas

You should consider the following when answering your question: 
  1. Think about who reports information and how that information is used.
  2. Think about your privacy and how you manage your on-line presence.
  3. Think about how social media can be introduced as evidence at trials.
  4. Think about how social media can be used for reporting during trials.
  5. Do viewer/user comments about media coverage of a trial provide valuable feedback for discussion or not? Why?
  6.  Is public shaming protected by the right to free speech or is this a case where our old norms and principles have simply been exposed as unfit for a new era?
Remember, you'll get links to help on both Thursday and Friday and


And from Vice

While it may seem that cancel culture and call out culture align with the same purpose, both concepts differ in resolution. Call out culture has more of a direct focus on education and progress, provided the person being ‘called out’ has the desire to grow and learn from their wrongdoings or mistakes. Anyone can be called out, and by doing so, anyone can learn to educate themselves and/or change their perspective for the better. Cancel culture aims to rid the person on the receiving end of any kind of redemption. So while the two are similar, keep in mind that they both come to different conclusions. And if you’re going to cancel or call someone out, remember what you want from it.

And from Vox

All along, debate about cancel culture has obscured its roots in a quest to attain some form of meaningful accountability for public figures who are typically answerable to no one. But after centuries of ideological debate turning over questions of free speech, censorship, and, in recent decades, “political correctness,” it was perhaps inevitable that the mainstreaming of cancel culture would obscure the original concerns that canceling was meant to address. Now it’s yet another hyperbolic phase of the larger culture war. The core concern of cancel culture — accountability — remains as crucial a topic as ever. But increasingly, the cancel culture debate has become about how we communicate within a binary, right versus wrong framework. And a central question is not whether we can hold one another accountable, but how we can ever forgive.


A Block Physical Geography - Today you have your quiz on Weather, Climate, and Climate Change. It's just 25 multiple selection questions with a weather forecast and you may use your note packages to help.  
After, we look at the ethics associated with resource use focusing on the four ethical views on resource use (economic/exploitation; preservationist; balanced-multiple use; and ecological or sustainable), specifically focusing on water.
  

We'll talk about over-consumption and unsustainable resource use practices through the “Tragedy of the Commons”, popularized by Garret Hardin, in terms of resource use and management, using the example of water consumption connected to the Aral Sea. From National Geographic:

Actually a freshwater lake, the Aral Sea once had a surface area of 26,000 square miles (67,300 square kilometers). It had long been ringed with prosperous towns and supported a lucrative muskrat pelt industry and thriving fishery, providing 40,000 jobs and supplying the Soviet Union with a sixth of its fish catch...The Aral Sea was fed by two of Central Asia's mightiest rivers, the Amu Darya and the Syr Darya. But in the 1960s, Soviet engineers decided to make the vast steppes bloom. They built an enormous irrigation network, including 20,000 miles of canals, 45 dams, and more than 80 reservoirs, all to irrigate sprawling fields of cotton and wheat in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. In the decades that followed, the Aral Sea was reduced to a handful of small lakes, with a combined volume that was one-tenth the original lake's size and that had much higher salinity, due to all the evaporation. As a result of the drying over the past decades, millions of fish died, coastlines receded miles from towns, and those few people who remained were plagued by dust storms that contained the toxic residue of industrial agriculture and weapons testing in the area.



Today's Fit...